Can the Satanic Temple survive its “civil war”? – By Gwenda Bond (salon.com) / Aug 28 2018
What happens when an organization founded on inclusivity and activism partners with an attorney for the alt-right?
The Satanic Temple unveils its statue of Baphomet, a winged-goat creature, at a rally for the first amendment in Little Rock, Ark., Thursday, Aug. 16, 2018. (AP/Hannah Grabenstein)
When we think of organized Satanism — if we think of it — most of us probably mentally conjure the winged eyebrows of Anton LaVey, who founded the Church of Satan back in 1966. But the headline-maker of note where Satanists are concerned lately is The Satanic Temple, and it seems to be embroiled in a battle for its own soul.
As my co-host Cher Martinetti and I discussed on a recent episode of our podcast about cults and extreme belief, “Cult Faves,” The Satanic Temple (TST for short) is turning into a fascinating case study of a group that attracts the type of joiner who will not go in cultish lock-step with its leaders. When TST was founded in 2012, it set itself up as a nontheistic group with an explicit mission of political activism, and with principles that made it attractive to politically-minded free thinkers.
“The people who do call themselves Satanists do genuinely believe in social justice issues and they are progressive, and maybe sometimes skew a little anarchist,” says Martinetti.
But TST isn’t without controversy it didn’t intentionally create. Take its ongoing shade war via FAQs with the Church of Satan, which raises a valid point that TST’s branding creates confusion — without being true copyright infringement. They and journalists have uncovered evidence that TST’s initial founding by Malcom Jarry and Lucien Greaves — both pseudonyms — originally involved a parody film, and that the part of Greaves was offered to others before being taken on by a man whose real name is Doug Mesner.
Journalist Anna Merlan, who first covered TST for The Village Voice back in 2014, wrote a bombshell piece for Jezebel earlier this month about the “civil war” roiling the TST community after Greaves’ decision to hire an attorney with ties to alt-right clientele. Attorney Marc Randazza has defended the likes of Alex Jones and the founder of the Daily Stormer, and now TST, as Greaves pursues legal action against Twitter for religious discrimination after his brief suspension from the platform.
The circumstances for the suspension, which involve former teen star Corey Feldman, are quite bizarre. First, Feldman retweeted a person calling for the headquarters of TST to be burned down. When Greaves shared Feldman’s retweet and asked people to report the original poster for violating Twitter’s rule against threats of violence, Twitter suspended Greaves’ account instead and then later reinstated it. TST is now suing Twitter.
The reaction from TST’s social justice-fueled chapters to Randazza’s hiring (which Greaves is quick to say is pro bono) has been swift and — apparently to everyone except Greaves — predictable. So far the Los Angeles and Portland chapters have said goodbye to TST over this issue, and the co-head of the New York chapter resigned. There are also allegations that despite its inclusive ideals, TST has not necessarily made itself an inclusive movement — which is a hard reputation to shake when the majority of leadership is composed of white men.
“I just don’t trust it,” says Martinetti in the episode. “I just don’t trust anytime anybody is trying to force everyone into a group mentality without allowing you to ask questions about it. ”
Will TST get its act together or will it continue to fracture? Only time will tell. But if Greaves has told the truth in interviews about not wanting to be a cult leader, then a first step would be to truly listen to the objections of TST’s membership.
Listen to our episode on The Satanic Temple here: https://radiopublic.com/cult-faves-6NaR9m/ep/s1!ca8cd
https://www.salon.com/2018/08/28/can-the-satanic-temple-survive-its-civil-war/
