How Disgruntled Fishermen Could Prompt SCOTUS To Capsize The Administrative State – By Margot Cleveland (The Federalist) / Jan 17, 2024
While you may not care about fisheries, you should care about Chevron deference, which gives too much power to unelected bureaucrats.
The United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday in two companion cases that could put an end to our totalitarian administrative state: Relentless Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright v. Raimondo.
Here’s your lawsplainer to understand the cases, the legal doctrine at issue — Chevron deference — the oral argument, the punditry surrounding the cases, and the significance of what, on its surface, may appear to be narrow and nerdy issues of administrative law.
