Servicewomen slam Wall Street Journal op-ed that says women don’t belong in combat: It ‘risks reducing the American military’s lethality’ – By Makers Newsroom (Makers) / Jan 15 2019
Female Marine Corps recruits drill on the rifle range at the Marine Corps recruit depot on Parris Island, S.C., on June 21, 2004. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Servicewomen and female veterans are ready for combat on a new battlefield — online.
On Jan. 3, Heather Mac Donald, a political commentator and attorney, wrote an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal about why women don’t belong in combat units — and servicewomen are not having it.
“The Obama-era policy of integrating women into ground combat units is a misguided social experiment that threatens military readiness and wastes resources in the service of a political agenda,” Mac Donald wrote. “The next defense secretary should end it.”
Mac Donald, the author of The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture, wrote that the physical standards for military recruits have been updated with lower physical and endurance requirements because women couldn’t meet previous standards.
Another issue, Mac Donald argues, is the problematic sexual tension that “guarantees sexual liaisons, rivalries, and breakups, all of which undermine the bonding essential to a unified fighting force.” She also talked to a Marine commander who served in Afghanistan about how the dynamics shifted with the arrival of an all-female task force. According to this unnamed commander, the atmosphere of his post shifted from a “stern, businesslike place to that of an eighth-grade dance” as men put on a show supposedly to impress their new female companions.
All in all, the attorney declared that the movement to integrate more women in the armed forces “entails a denial of biological reality” and “risks reducing the American military’s lethality.”
In response, servicewomen put up a united front, pointing out the holes in Mac Donald’s argument.
Michele Poole, Navy veteran who is now a Georgetown law student, called the information “fake news” and posted an article originally written for Military.com that says that Marine fitness tests have actually become more difficult this year in an effort “to up the standards for all Marines.”
Opinion: The military is watering down fitness standards for combat units because most female recruits can’t meet them, writes @HMDatMI https://t.co/ok1X0B6CSL
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) January 14, 2019
Meanwhile, other servicewomen were critical of the Wall Street Journal for not asking a female veteran with combat experience their opinion instead. “Has the author ever served? No?” questioned one enraged female army veteran. “Then don’t write an opinion piece on something you know nothing about. Ask actual women vets to write them.”
Women have been involved in American combat missions for years, though their contributions have often gone unrecognized. It wasn’t until 2012, when veteran MJ Hegar won her suit against the U.S. secretary of defense to take down the combat exclusion policy, that women finally got the opportunity to serve on the frontline.
Women Weren’t Allowed on the Frontlines Until This U.S. Veteran Fought for the Right to Defend Her Country | Bold & Untold by MAKERS
After three tours in Afghanistan, MJ Hegar battled sexism at home—and won the right for women to pursue combat careers in the military.
“The fact that I had been a proven combat warrior, somebody who can keep their calm while the bullets are flying, someone who is a competent person, who pulls their weight, I should be afforded the opportunity to use those skills and to fight and defend and protect the things that I believe in,” Hegar told Makers.
See the best reactions from U.S. servicewomen and female veterans who fired back:
Opinion: The military is watering down fitness standards for combat units because most female recruits can’t meet them, writes @HMDatMI https://t.co/ok1X0B6CSL
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) January 14, 2019
My latest: The military is watering down fitness standards because most female recruits can’t meet them. https://t.co/Ftd3ctARCH via @WSJopinion
— Heather Mac Donald (@HMDatMI) January 14, 2019
https://twitter.com/baltenburg/status/1084941575917064192
https://twitter.com/Tammy_GA/status/1084803544992092160
So we had "McNamara's Morons" to address falling recruitment for Vietnam. That went well. What shall we call the newly qualified women who will swell the military ranks for the current wars? And will there be safe spaces? Will equality of outcome be assured? Puzzled…
— Sharon Hawkins (@frascatti58) January 14, 2019
