The Cancer of Election Fraud – By Jim Troupis (The American Mind) / May 23, 2022
Americans must reckon with what the courts failed to resolve.
For those paying attention to detail, Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules provides evidence of what virtually everyone knows. Under the cover of COVID, and with the enormous boost from undisclosed financial backers, efforts were taken to deliver for tabulation as many ballots as possible, without regard to their source.
That this investigative work must be undertaken by documentarians and concerned citizens represents the unconscionable failure of our courts to examine the relevant evidence. As Wisconsin’s Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley wrote in her dissent to the majority decision in Trump v. Biden (2020),
The majority’s failure to act leaves an indelible stain on our most recent election. It will also profoundly and perhaps irreparably impact all local, statewide and national elections going forward, with grave consequences to the State of Wisconsin and significant harm to the rule of law (¶ 156 ).
Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Alito and Gorsuch, made a similarly pointed observation when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the evidence or the law in the 2020 election cases:
These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules…. The refusal to do so is inexplicable. (Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid 141 S. Ct. 732 [Feb. 22, 2021] cert denied.).
CONTINUE > https://americanmind.org/features/the-haunting-of-the-american-mind/the-cancer-of-election-fraud/
