Trump wall: New proposal ties Dreamer plan to border clampdown – By BBC Staff (bbc.com) / Oct 9 2017
The White House has tied any new deal on young undocumented immigrants to a clampdown on illegal immigration, including a border wall with Mexico.
US President Donald Trump is asking for funding for the wall, speedier deportations and the hiring of thousands of new immigration officials.
Last month he ended the Obama-era “Dreamer” programme which had protected some 690,000 immigrants.
Leading Democrats in Congress have rejected the latest proposals.
They accused Mr Trump of backtracking on a commitment not to include the border wall in negotiations over the status of young immigrants, who are mostly from Mexico and other Latin American countries.
The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) programme, set up in 2012 under President Barack Obama, is due to expire in March, casting doubt on the future of those protected.
What are Trump’s demands?
The list of “principles” delivered by the White House to Congress on Sunday includes:
- Constructing the border wall with Mexico
- Employing 10,000 additional Immigration and Customs
- Enforcement officers and 1,000 lawyers for the agency
- Hiring an extra 370 immigration judges and 300 federal prosecutors
- Banning immigrants from bringing their extended family members to the US
- Penalising “sanctuary cities” that have resisted the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on illegal immigrants
- Having companies use an E-Verify programme to keep illegal immigrants from getting jobs
“These findings outline reforms that must be included as part of any legislation addressing the status of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients,” Mr Trump wrote in a letter to Congress accompanying the list.
His legislative affairs director, Marc Short, said the priorities were “essential to mitigate the legal and economic consequences of any grant of status to Daca recipients”.
Last month, Mr Trump told Congress, which is dominated by his Republican party, it had six months to agree new legislation to help the Dreamers.
Who are the Dreamers?
They are young people who were brought to or entered the US illegally as children and as such faced deportation.
Under Mr Obama’s policy, they were able to apply for work and study permits but critics said the scheme amounted to an amnesty for illegal immigrants.
Since the scheme was introduced, about 100,000 recipients have seen their status lapse or change, leaving about 690,000 recipieIn order to qualify for Daca, applicants under the age of 30 submitted personal information to the Department of Homeland Security.
They had to go through an FBI background check and have a clean criminal background, and either be in education, have recently graduated or have been honourably discharged from the military.
In exchange, the US government agreed to “defer” any action on their immigration status for a period of two years.
What do the Democrats say?
“The administration can’t be serious about compromise or helping the Dreamers if they begin with a list that is anathema to the Dreamers, to the immigrant community and to the vast majority of Americans,” House of Representatives Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said in a joint statement.
“The list includes the wall, which was explicitly ruled out of the negotiations. If the president was serious about protecting the Dreamers, his staff has not made a good faith effort to do so.”
Mr Schumer and Ms Pelosi said in a statement after a meeting with Mr Trump last month that he had told them funding for the wall would not be part of a Daca deal.
However, the next day White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tweeted that “excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to”.
Will the wall actually be built?
It was one of Mr Trump’s most controversial election pledges but debate has raged over how it will be funded.
The US leader insisted Mexico itself should pay but the authorities there have rejected the idea.
Meanwhile, a prototype was erected near San Diego, California, last week.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41548363
PB/TK – I don’t think too many would argue the need for more staff within Border and Immigration departments; that argument has been around for decades and Congress (both DEM & GOP led) have their feet in cement. And when legislation funding has been passed, the mass push to hire has led to many being “unfit” to work. Forcing companies to use “E-verify” has been another soapbox that never comes to fruition, yet what is happening between the camera/mic time is the age old game of “everyone’s a pawn.” Yep everyone/everything is a pawn in debate, so who enjoys being held hostage by Party?
